Cover Talk

As an author waiting to see your cover is scary. I think every author would agree. Many authors probably have a certain image in mind and maybe even told their publisher about their certain vision for their book.

But that doesn't mean you get your wish. Because the process of creating a cover is more complicated than just finding a pretty image. It has to be right for the target audience, it has to reflect the inside of the book somehow (ideally, though that isn't always the case), it has to stand out on shelves while still following trends. Because many people judge a book by its cover.

And that's a very scary thing for an author. Because while we have power over what's inside the book, many readers might never get that far because they don't like what's outside.

So you can imagine how nervous I was before I was shown the cover of The Other Life. And though I knew Usborne, my Uk pub had done an awesome job with the cover for the first book, I was again nervous before I got to see the cover for its sequel The Life Beyond. But then I was relieved and so happy.
Two days ago I was allowed to reveal the cover to THE LIFE BEYOND and here it is:

As you can see it's quite similar to the first book THE OTHER LIFE. That way people will know that they belong together and as an added bonus the two books will look gorgeous on the shelf together! If you take a closer look, you'll notice that the butterfly changed a bit. It's still bleeding but what's happening inside has changed and the butterfly looks scarier, more like a hornet. That reflects the book, because it's getting more dangerous for Sherry and Joshua, and for a few other survivors as you might guess from the scene in the butterfly. And the skyline in the background has changed slightly too. Again to reflect a certain scene in the book. But I won't tell you more!
What do you think?


Lexile and (Lack of) Subtext

Yesterday, Mike posted about the Lexile system being used in schools to guide students towards reading that is challenging enough for their reading comprehension levels. It was the first I had heard of it. After reading Mike's post, I checked out the Lexile site to see what Lexile measures, and now I am even more sure that solely using Lexile scores to determine what students should read is doing them a grave disservice.

What does Lexile measure?
Lexile measures the quantitative aspects of text complexity, such as word length or frequency, sentence length, and text cohesion.

What doesn't Lexile measure?
Lexile can't measure the qualitative aspects of text complexity such as subtext, symbolism, and figurative language. It also can't measure the complexity of story aspects such as multiple plotlines, settings that require background knowledge to fully appreciate, and non-linear structure.

Some very challenging books are written in a deceptively simple way.  Let me offer up my experience with HOMO FABER by Max Frisch as an example.  HOMO FABER was the first novel I read entirely in German (the language it was originally written in). At the time, my German skill was on the advanced side of intermediate, and I could easily understand the vocabulary used in the novel.  What I didn't understand, however, was the subtext - and consequently, I missed the entire point of the story.

Witness this reconstructed conversation between my husband Daniel (who is a native German speaker) and me.

ME: So, HOMO FABER was pretty boring. The main character just travels around and has these romantic affairs with women. Big deal. 
DANIEL: Actually, HOMO FABER is a powerful treatise on fate versus coincidence. I thought you'd love it considering your interest in coincidence. Also, it alludes to the Oedipus myth. 
ME: Really? What were the coincidences? I didn't notice any. And Oedipus? Really? 
DANIEL: Uhhhh... did you not get that the woman he proposed to on the cruise to Europe was actually his daughter, but he didn't even know he had a daughter? It's a modern twist on the Oedipal archetype.  
ME: !!!!!!!! 
DANIEL: Yeah ... maybe you need to read it again.

HOMO FABER doesn't have a Lexile score, but I can imagine that if it did, it would be low - and summarily dismissed as too easy to waste precious reading time on. (This, of course, is entirely avoiding the topic of age-appropriateness of content). 

There is so much more to reading than a quantitative score based on word choice and sentence length. And students who are forced to adhere to such a strict system are sadly losing out on the qualitative experience a book can provide. 




How the Lexile System Harms Students

About a month ago, a woman approached me at a conference. She picked up a copy of ASHFALL and asked me, "What's the Lexile on this?"

This question threw me for a bit of a loop. I'm used to being asked what ASHFALL's about, how much it is, or where I got the idea for it. "What's a Lexile?" I asked.


"They use it at my daughter's school," she replied. "To match students with books at the right level for them."

"Oh, like the Guided Reading level." I happen to know about those because my wife's school district uses them. They always seemed a bit idiotic--what reader chooses a book based solely on its reading level? But since at her school they're used as suggestions, not mandates, and take the content of the books into account, they've never really bothered me. "ASHFALL is a Z+ on the Guided Reading level scale," I said.

Here's where the rabbit hole started to get twisty. "We don't use Guided Reading," she said. "We use Lexiles. And my daughter isn't allowed to read anything below 1,000." The italics are mine. You'll have to imagine my angry shouting at a school that won't allow their students to read--no matter what the excuse.

"I'm sure it's fine, then. ASHFALL is a Z+. It's got to be at least a thousand on your school's scale. What does she like to read?"

"She loved The Hunger Games, but the school wouldn't count it. It's too easy for her." (I later looked up The Hunger Games--its Lexile level is 810.)

"A lot of teens who liked The Hunger Games enjoy ASHFALL. How old is your daughter?"

"She's in sixth grade."

"You should read ASHFALL first, then--it depicts an apocalypse realistically. It's very violent. Definitely not appropriate for all sixth-graders."

"That's okay. I just need to know what the Lexile level is. Can you look it up?"

I obliged and found ASHFALL listed at Lexile.com. Its level? 750.

"It's too easy for her, then." The woman walked away as my lower jaw hit the table with an audible slap.

For kicks, I looked up Ernest Hemingway's masterpiece, A Farewell to Arms. Its Lexile? 730.

Is my work more difficult, more sophisticated, or more appropriate for older readers than that of Mr. Hemingway, a Nobel Laureate in literature? Of course not! Think about it: If this poor student stays in her school system, she'll NEVER be allowed to read A Farewell to Arms. It's allegedly too easy for her.

Since this conversation, I've heard of a high school that boxed up all its copies of Night, Elie Wiesel's classic account of surviving the holocaust, and sent them to the elementary school, because it's "too easy" for high school students. It's Lexile is 570.

Shocking as that example is, there's a bigger problem: the Lexile system punishes good writing and rewards bad writing. I'll illustrate this point with an example. Here's the first sentence of a book that sixth-grader would have been allowed to read, a book with a Lexile of 1650:
"ON the theory that our genuine impulses may be connected with our childish experiences, that one's bent may be tracked back to that "No-Man's Land" where character is formless but nevertheless settling into definite lines of future development, I begin this record with some impressions of my childhood."
Forty-eight words that can be replaced by three with no loss of  meaning: 'My childhood was.' This is a truly awful opening, whatever your opinion of the overall work.

Here's a novel millions of sixth-graders have enjoyed. A novel with a Lexile of only 820. A novel this woman's daughter would not be allowed to read:
“They say Maniac Magee was born in a dump. They say his stomach was a cereal box and his heart a sofa spring. They say he kept an eight-inch cockroach on a leash.”
It's clear and concise. It introduces the main character and opens irresistible story questions in the reader's mind. If it were rewritten as one sentence, it would lose the flavor of gossip that makes it intriguing--and have a much higher Lexile score.

Good writing is simple. The best writers never use two words where one will do, and they choose their words with precision. But the Lexile system rewards complexity and obscurity by assigning higher Lexile scores for works with longer sentences and longer words. In short, students forced to use the Lexile system in their reading are being taught to be bad writers. And some are likely being forced into books that will turn them off to reading.

What should you do? If you're a school administrator, teacher, or librarian, quit using Lexiles. I realize your motto isn't, "First, do no harm," but is that such a bad precept to follow? The Lexile system is actively harmful to your students.

If you're a parent, let your child pick books the way you do--based on interest and need. Ask your school to dump the Lexile system. The last thing we need is an expensive program that makes the great work parents, teachers and librarians do--educating our children--more difficult.
post signature

Crewel is Amazing


I absolutely loved Gennifer Albin's debut novel, Crewel. Let me try to explain why, but since I'm a writer, I'll make it hard on myself and use pictures. Here goes.

To get this:


You combine this:




With this (the three fates of Greek mythology):


But replace this guy:



With someone more like this:


Now do you want to read it? Buy a copy at Indiebound, B&N, Amazon or The Book Depository. Or, enter to win a copy below:

a Rafflecopter giveaway
 
post signature

The Crewel Sentence

You can read my thoughts about the marvelous world-building in CREWEL at my Dystopian August review, but today I want to talk about Gennifer Albin's gorgeous sentences.

Gennifer led a workshop on line-editing during Write On Con back in September, and she rocked it. Her sentences are deceptively simple - clear yet so evocative.  I wanted to include some of my favorites here from the first two chapters as to not get too spoilery.  (NOTE: These sentences are taken from the advance reader edition of CREWEL, so they may vary slightly from the final published version.)



From Chapter 1:

"That's why I don't tell them the truth. I want love - not excitement or worry - to be the lingering imprint they leave on me."

"The only constant - the one real thing in this moment - is Amie's fragile hand clutching my own. I hold onto it for life, hers and mine. It anchors me, and when my mother wrenches her away, I shriek, sure I'll vanish into nothing."

From Chapter 2:

"A group of women scurry down behind the official and begin wiping my face and combing my hair. It feels so nice I want to fall asleep. The only thing keeping me awake is the cold, gritty concrete under my bare feet."

"I think of the dining room table and white cake sitting on it, the black blood under its legs, and shake my head. The only thing I'm hungry for is answers."

"Somewhere a girl sits, replacing the weave of the rebound chamber with that of a chamber in the Coventry, effectively moving me from one location to the other. I'm traveling hundreds of miles without moving a muscle."


I hope you enjoyed this teaser! Check out this post to enter to win a signed hardcover of CREWEL!

CREWEL: The Real World in a Fantasy Dystopian Fiction

CREWEL is about weaving magic, replacing time with threads, and discovering what true power is. One of the things I found most fascinating about Genn's brilliant writing is the clever twists of words and double-meaning to much of her world.

The most obvious is the twist of the word "spinster." In our society, we tend to refer to unmarried women as spinsters, and it's a phrase often used in a negative way. But Genn uses spinsters not only to remind readers that her girls must remain single in their service, but also to play on the magic-system of her world--a world where fate and time is literally spun and woven.

This isn't the only story that uses the idea of women spinning fate. In Ancient Greece, the Moirai were three sisters who spun, measured, and cut the threads of life.  In many of the legends, the Moirai is outside the gods' powers, capable of doing as they pleased and unable to be influenced (or threatened or bribed) by the other gods to change what fates they've doled out. In many ways, the Moirai were stronger even than Zeus. They were the ultimate controllers, and the pattern they wove could be altered by no one but them.

Of course, weaving and sewing also play a role in CREWEL, but one of the  things I found most fascinating was the source of the title itself. Crewel embroidery is a special type of embroidery that literally paints a picture with thread. It's probably most famous for being the type of embroidery used for the Bayeux Tapestry.


But at the same time, I can't help but think that Genn picked this title not just because of the link to embroidery, threads, and spinning, but also because of the way it sounds: like "cruel." Because main character Adelice certainly does live in a cruel world...

But I don't want you to think that CREWEL is all about threads and sewing--far be it from that! CREWEL is an exciting dystopian blending science fiction and fantasy, and it is only through clever wordplay and plot twists that you start to see how much detail Genn put into her world. 

But you don't have to just listen to me. Here's Karen Jensen, Teen Services Librarian, and her take on CREWEL:
“This year’s masterpiece…teeming with rich discussions about things like responsibility to society, free will, the role of women, revolution, and more…Crewel could be this generation’s The Handmaid’s Tale."  - Karen Jensen, Teen Services Librarian
What are you waiting for? Discover the world of CREWEL today!

Introducing CREWEL!! A Debut You Simply Can't Miss!

Oh my heck, you guys. I'll admit to a shady reading of this ARC. I've been wanting to get my hands on CREWEL pretty much since the moment Genn announced her deal.

And I happened to get a review copy I needed to give away as part of WriteOnCon. So during all the craziness, I stayed up late and devoured CREWEL. Now I get to introduce it to you!

Trust me when I say you're going to love it. LOVE IT.

Pre-order it. You won't be sorry -- and you won't have to wait long, because it's out tomorrow! Or, download the first five chapters for free, get hooked, and run down to your local bookstore tomorrow and buy the book!

You can find the description of the book all over the Internet. Basically it's about a girl named Adelice who can see the weave of the world. Time, matter, all of it. This is rare and dangerous if known by the wrong people.

Genn is an amazing author who takes you on a journey you won't soon forget. There's danger. Death. And boys. Cute ones, even when you don't want to think they're cute.

She weaves (oh my heck! See what I did there?) a brilliantly crafted plot with an extremely likable and sympathetic character that I would go anywhere with. And quite literally, I did as I read CREWEL.

She's going to be all over the web for the next few weeks! Be sure to follow along in all the CREWEL fun.


Not only that, but Genn might be coming to a city near you as part of the Fierce Reads tour:
  • October 16: Warren-Newport Public Library in Gurnee, IL
  • October 17: Politics & Prose at the Bethesda Library outside of Washington D.C.
  • October 18: Cover to Cover Bookstore in Columbus, OH
  • October 19: Square Books in Oxford, MS
  • October 20: Children’s Book World in Haverford, PA
  • October 21: New York City (Exact location TBD!)
And we're giving away a signed hardcover of CREWEL as part of launch week here at The League! Enter in the rafflecopter below. a Rafflecopter giveaway Have you read CREWEL? Got it pre-ordered? Ready for the awesomeness? Get ready!